Bilateral Myeloid Sarcoma of Breast: A Case Report and Discussion
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Case Report
VOLUME: 22 ISSUE: 3
P: 363 - 367
July 2026

Bilateral Myeloid Sarcoma of Breast: A Case Report and Discussion

Eur J Breast Health 2026;22(3):363-367
1. Department of Ultrasound Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 16.11.2025
Accepted Date: 26.01.2026
Online Date: 17.06.2026
Publish Date: 17.06.2026
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Myeloid sarcoma (MS) involving the breast is rare. We reviewed a case of a 21-year-old female with palpable masses in the bilateral breasts without medullary acute myeloid leukemia. Ultrasound revealed irregular, indistinct, and complex hypoechoic masses with internal blood flow and hyperechoic halos in the bilateral breasts. A biopsy was subsequently recommended, and MS was confirmed. Further cytogenetic evaluation of breast biopsy specimens demonstrated positive t(16;16)(p13.1;q22) translocation. The patient was admitted for chemotherapy. Subsequent follow-up breast ultrasound following chemotherapy revealed a notable treatment response. This report aims to delineate the ultrasound characteristics of breast MS and the utilization of ultrasound in the evaluation of early response to chemotherapy.

Keywords:
Myeloid sarcoma, breast, ultrasonography

KEY POINTS

• Myeloid sarcoma (MS) involving bilateral breast is rare but aggressive.

• Ultrasound plays a certain role in the initial evaluation of breast MS.

• The assessment of therapeutic response involves the use of ultrasound.

Introduction

Myeloid sarcoma (MS), also known as granulocytic sarcoma or chloroma, is a rare subtype of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that involves the extramedullary proliferation of myeloid blasts. It often occurs concomitantly with AML or myelodysplastic diseases, and rarely without bone marrow involvement (1, 2). MS involving the breast is even rarer. Imaging knowledge of breast MS remains limited due to its rarity. This study aims to enhance the understanding of ultrasound characteristics of the disease.

Case Presentation

A 21-year-old female presented to our breast clinic with a 6-month history of rapidly enlarging palpable and painless breast masses in January 2024. She denied any other notable medical history. A physical examination revealed firm lumps measuring 60×55 mm and 20×15 mm, respectively, in the left and right subareolar areas. The presence of light skin edema was observed in the central retroareolar region of both breasts.

The ultrasound revealed two distinct masses in the right breast. The first mass, measuring 50×42 mm, was identified in the central retroareolar region, while the second, measuring 50×21 mm, was located in the upper outer quadrant (Figure 1). The masses were irregularly shaped with indistinct margins, a non-homogeneous hypoechoic central portion, and a hyperechoic peripheral halo. Relatively rich internal blood flow signals with a resistance index of 0.57 were observed. Concurrently, in the left breast, a substantial hypoechoic mass was identified in the central retroareolar region, measuring approximately 74×50 mm. Additionally, a smaller hypoechoic mass was detected in the upper inner quadrant (Figure 2). These masses presented similarly in appearance on ultrasound. Furthermore, an abnormal lymph node measuring 15×8 mm was identified in the left axilla, characterized by cortical thickening, loss of lymphoid follicles, and a hyperechoic peripheral halo (Figure 2). The patient was given a breast imaging-reporting and data system classification of 4b. In light of the potential radiation exposure, the recommendation was made to opt for an ultrasound-guided biopsy over mammography.

Pathology showed breast tissue with diffuse infiltrate of blasts, consistent with MS (Figure 3). The neoplastic cells were strongly positive for myeloperoxidase, CD33, CD43, and CD34, and partially positive for CD117 and CD68. The patient went on to have a bone marrow biopsy, yielding no clear evidence of medullary ALM. Subsequent cytogenetic testing of breast biopsy specimens demonstrated positive t(16;16)(p13.1;q22) translocation (GBFβ-MYH11 gene). Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) imaging revealed multiple metabolically active masses in both breasts, as well as metabolic activity in lymph nodes, intestinal wall at the terminal ileum, uterus, bilateral ovaries, left perineum, and left parieto-occipital subcutaneous tissue and muscles.

The patient was referred to hematological oncology, where she underwent six cycles of chemotherapy comprising cytarabine and sorafenib. Following the first cycle of chemotherapy, ultrasound imaging demonstrated a notable treatment response (Figure 4). The mass in the upper inner quadrant of the left breast and the left axillary lymph node disappeared. A PET-CT scan, conducted after four cycles of chemotherapy, revealed no evidence of residual tumors. At the latest follow-up in May 2025, the patient was thriving and disease-free.

Discussion and Conclusion

MS is a distinct entity among myeloid neoplasms. It is characterized by the development of tumor masses, consisting of immature myeloid cells at extramedullary sites. MS involving the breast is rare. Breast MS is characterized by the presence of masses in the breast with rapid enlargement. Patients typically present to breast clinics, and breast ultrasound is most frequently utilized.

We reviewed prior literature. Breast MS is always characterized by irregular shape, indistinct margin, and hypoechoic pattern (3-14). Furthermore, the presentation of breast MS may manifest as an oval form with a circumscribed margin (15). The current case adds additional imaging evidence to the limited literature. In this case, the internal echo pattern of the lesions in the left breast was completely hypoechoic, while the lesions in the right breast manifested as non-homogeneous hypoechoic. We speculated that the internal echo pattern exhibited variability due to the extent of infiltration by immature myeloid cells and the presence of residual lobules and ducts.

Though the relatively non-specific imaging characteristics of breast MS, ultrasound may play a certain role in the initial evaluation. Bilateral breast involvement with multiple masses is comparatively common in breast MS (3, 5, 9-12, 15). Interestingly, in cases involving multiple lesions, ultrasound mass characteristics demonstrate a tendency to manifest similarly (3, 5, 9-12, 15). Echogenic halo is common in breast MS (3-5, 9, 11-14). While calcification is rare in breast MS. Histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations are necessary for confirming the final diagnosis. Following admission to chemotherapy, breast ultrasound is a simple and effective modality for assessing the early therapeutic response.

Though relatively non-specific, breast MS tends to present as irregular, indistinct, and complex hypoechoic masses with internal blood flow on ultrasound. Hyperechoic halos are common. Ultrasound may play a certain role in the initial evaluation and follow-up therapeutic response assessment of breast MS.

Ethics

Informed Consent: The patient provided written informed consent for publication of the data and images in this case report.

Authorship Contributions

Concept: L.L.; Design: L.L., Y.L.; Data Collection or Processing: Z.L., H.Z., Y.Z.; Analysis or Interpretation: Z.L., H.Z., Y.Z.; Literature Search: L.L.; Writing: L.L., Y.L.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.

References

1
Cunningham I. A clinical review of breast involvement in acute leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2006; 47: 2517-25126. (
2
Ramia de Cap M, Chen W. Myeloid sarcoma: an overview. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2023; 40: 129-139. (
3
Minoia C, de Fazio V, Scognamillo G, Scattone A, Maggialetti N, Ferrari C, et al. Long-lasting remission in de novo breast myeloid sarcoma treated with decitabine and radiotherapy. Diagnostics (Basel). 2019; 9: 84. (
4
Amiraian D, McDonough M, Geiger X. Bilateral myeloid sarcoma of the breast: a case report with radiological and pathological correlation. Cureus. 2022; 14: e24731. (
5
Zhang Z, Chen Y, Zhang R, Liu M. Primary breast myeloid sarcoma: a case report and literature review. Oncol Lett. 2024; 29: 58. (
6
Naamo S, Naamo S, Sarker S, Vasconez M, Froicu M. Breast manifestation of extramedullary myeloid sarcoma: a case report. Radiol Case Rep. 2022; 17: 4660-4665. (
7
Kim SJ, Kim WG. Sonographic features of a myeloid sarcoma of the breast as a relapse of acute myeloid leukemia after stem-cell transplantation: a case report. Am J Case Rep. 2019; 20: 612-619. (
8
Nia ES, Leung JWT. Solitary palpable breast mass as the initial presentation of clinically silent extramedullary acute myeloid leukemia. Breast J. 2020; 26: 267-268. (
9
Sosa YJ, Pope D, Monetto FEP, Robinson A, Klimberg VS. Hematologic malignancies of the breast: report of three cases. Radiol Case Rep. 2022; 17: 1384-1390. (
10
Ozsoy A, Akdal Dolek B, Barca N, Aktas H, Araz L, Kulacoglu S. Ultrasound findings in a case of myeloid sarcoma of the breast. J Belg Soc Radiol. 2016; 100: 15. (
11
Nalwa A, Nath D, Suri V, Jamaluddin MA, Srivastava A. Myeloid sarcoma of the breast in an aleukemic patient: a rare entity in an uncommon location. Malays J Pathol. 2015; 37: 63-66. (
12
Myers CB, Ene A, Clark A. A rare presentation of myeloid sarcoma as symmetrical bilateral breast masses. Clin Imaging. 2022; 85: 94-98. (
13
Le Y, Leng X. Primary granulocytic sarcoma of the breast. Lancet Oncol. 2025; 26: e331. (
14
Wu S, Lin Z, Shang Q, Pang Y, Chen H. Use of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT for detecting myeloid sarcoma of the breast and assessing early response to chemotherapy. Clin Nucl Med. 2022; 47: 549-550. (
15
Huang C, Fei S, Yao J, Chen P, Luo J, Wang Y, et al. Breast myeloid sarcoma presenting as a palpable breast lump after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myelomonocytic leukemia: a rare case report. World J Surg Oncol. 2021; 19: 289. (